Cabinet Government

The English Constitution emphasises the divide of the constitution into two components, the Dignified (that part which is symbolic) and the Efficient (the way things actually work and get done), and call this Cabinet Government.

 Although there have been many works since emphasising different aspects of the “Efficient”, no one has seriously questioned the premise that the divide exists in the Westminster System.

Members of the Cabinet are collectively seen as responsible for government policy. All Cabinet decisions are made by consensus, a vote is rarely taken in a Cabinet meeting. All ministers, whether senior and in the Cabinet, or junior ministers, must support the policy of the government publicly regardless of any private reservations.

When a Cabinet reshuffle is imminent, a lot of time is taken up in the conversations of politicians, and in the news media speculating on who will, or will not, be moved in and out of the Cabinet by the Prime Minister, because the appointment of ministers to the Cabinet, and threat of dismissal from the Cabinet, is the single most powerful constitutional power which a Prime Minister has in the political control of the Government in the Westminster system.

Linked to Cabinet Government is the idea, at least in theory, that ministers are responsible for the actions of their departments. It is no longer considered to be an issue of resignation if the actions of members of their department, over whom the minister has no direct control, make mistakes or formulate procedures which are not in accordance with agreed policy decisions. One of the major powers of the Prime Minister under the Westminster System is to decide when a fellow minister is accountable for the actions of a department.

The Official party of Opposition and other major political parties not in the Government, will mirror the governmental organisation with their own Shadow Cabinet made up of Shadow Ministers. Their job is to examine and critique Government policy and to put forward their own views of what is best to be done, theoretically holding Minsters accountable to the House for their actions or failures.